"INCOMES TAX HER? I HARDLY KNEW HER"
reminds me of comparing apples and oranges which do not make sense because
apples and oranges do not physically look the same neither do they have same
chemical composition.
In the area of
revenue collection, the federal government and the state government differ very
significantly. First of all, the federal government and the state government
have good working relationship in terms of revenue creation/allocation. Most
business are situated in the inside cities, municipalities, local governments,
and then state government, therefore the local government are in better position
to collect taxes be it sales or income based taxes
We live in a
representative government; therefore to say that Texas does not penalize
employed individuals by taking part of their wage before they can spend it
themselves is a wrong comparison to the federal income tax systems. For the simple fact that we’re compelled to
pay sales tax each time we buy certain things simple means we’re paying tax we
have no control over, period.
While consumer ism
has worked well for Texas, it is not by itself good for all Texans. If a state
imposes 6.5% tax every time you buy something, you are forced to pay such by
law whether you call it volunteerism or free willingness. Money is earned in
order to spend in exchange for the things we need. Why would Michael dell for example pay the
same tax as me since Michael dell gets so much tax incentives from the
government to build and operate his business? Michael for example gets to write
off his business expenses while the poor worker gets not to write off when I
buy shoe to go to work or earn a living.
I think it is not fair that low income should
pay the same tax s those in higher income bracket
How fair is it that tourists
who come to Texas to spend money on our products get to
be taxed for such exercise? It would have
been proper for the sake of argument for my colleague to specify how this could
have worked well on the federal government level.
How could the federal
government possibly collect sales tax; by deducting from total state sales tax; maybe if the
state collects 10 percent, for example, the federal takes the first six percent
then living the rest for the state. The federal government will now depend on
the state to generate her revenue.
Many companies and
individuals would probably in trade by batter in order to avoid paying those
taxes. Many people will result what I will consider to be ‘Craigslist’ market
systems where good will exchange hands without anyone paying taxes. This will
live the federal government broke, thereby wakening it.
It is no secret that
small percentage of population own most of the resources in this country,
therefore why would such people pay the same tax percent s someone like me
No comments:
Post a Comment